German version

August 2014 update on the OpenStreetMap coastline data quality

This is part of a semi-regular collection of reports on the development of the OpenStreetMap coastline data starting with an initial analysis of the quality of the OpenStreetMap coastline data and continuing with updates 1 and 2 and now here with the most recent update on the last half year.

Recent changes in the Openstreetmap coastline

Like previously most updates in the coastline cover only smaller areas and are located in regions of high general mapping activity. Here the subjective list of somewhat larger and more unusual changes since March.

The total length of the coastline is now 1.963 million kilometers (again somewhat less than last time). The average node distance is now 60 meters (was 61 in March).

The exclusion of water areas from the coastline

This is the second time there is an decrease in the total coastline length. The primary cause of this is a disturbing trend to exclude coastal water areas from the coastline mapping them separately as natural=water or waterway=riverbank. The coastline then remains essentially as a coarse hull enclosing all land areas and coastal waters and is only partially representing the actual coastline. The fact that nearly all OSM based maps make no distinction between ocean and inland water areas means this change is not visible but it has some very bad effects. Not only does it mean the coastline looses its meaning and any interpretation of the data would always have to interpret both the coastline and the water polygons. It also means there would be no way to distinguish ocean from non-maritime water areas from the data.

In some cases this retagging is based on a broad interpretation of what a river is and where it ends at its mouth. I wrote a proposal on the OSM wiki some time ago that outlines some rules how this limit can be placed in a sensible way. But there are other cases where there is not even a larger river that could warrant tagging costal waters as waterway=riverbank. I observed this particularly at tropical mangrove coasts where tidal channels in shallow water between mangrove areas are frequently tagged as rivers, probably because the form of these channels resembles estuaries elsewhere although the rivers in the area are fairly small. Much of the 'land' area between those channels is tidal mangrove forest and the whole area is dominated by tidal currents and not by waterflow from the rivers. Apart from the mangrove this is not unlike tidal flats at the North Sea coast of Germany and the Netherlands.

Coastline and coastal water areas at the West African coast

Updated quality analysis maps

Below are new version of the node distance, derivation angle and combined coastline quality maps. For detailed explanation see the initial coastline quality analysis.

Average node distance in OSM coastline data

Average derivation angle at coastline nodes in OSM data

Combined coastline quality

The map of the coastline data age is explained in more detail in the second update.

Age of the OSM coastline nodes

Christoph Hormann, August 2014

Visitor comments:

by osm-gormo posted on Tue Jan 13 2015 07:35:08
Interessante Auswertung! Gibts die als Sourcecode irgendwo?\\n\\nOben im Anreißertext fehlt ein "l" bei "hab-regelmäßigen Reihe"
by chris from Germany posted on Tue Jan 13 2015 09:31:12
Code gibt es derzeit noch nicht - muss ich mal ein bisschen aufarbeiten, ist halt derzeit hardcodiert für genau diese Anwendung, was etwas unschön ist.\\n\\nGrundsätzlich ist das aber recht einfach, müsste sich im Grunde auch mit ein bisschen SQL und anschließendem rastern machen lassen.\\n\\nDanke für die Korrektur.
Leave a comment
You have to enable Javascript to be able to write comments.
human verification Please enter the code you can see in the image on the left to verify you are a human and not a spamming script.
* * Required field
Information about you
will not be made public
will be displayed with your posting
Your comment (no HTML)


If you want to send a private message to the author of this website you can do so via Email.

The comments will be reviewed before they are added to the site. So you might need to wait some time until your entry turns up.

Please note this comment function is intended for commenting on the text and images, not for discussing political or religious views. Comments with no relation to the content of this site will not be approved.

By submitting your comment you agree to the privacy policy and agree to the information you provide (except for the email address) to be published on this website.